CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 631 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Discharge communication software +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Key inclusion· 3
  • Inpatient at OSF Saint Francis Medical Center
  • Discharged by hospitalist service or other inpatient services
  • High risk for poor post-discharge outcomes with probability of readmission (PRA) ≥0.4
Key exclusion· 9
  • Age less than 18 years
  • Life expectancy less than 6 months
  • Outpatient care will be from same physician as discharging physician
  • Does not speak English or Spanish

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT00101868
NCT00101868N/ACompleted

Value of Technology to Transfer Discharge Information

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)·interventional·Posted Jan 17, 2005·Updated May 15, 2012

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Discharge communication software and Usual care discharge process for Information Dissemination and Interprofessional Relations. Completed, enrolled 631 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

The transition from hospital to home is a high-risk period in a patient's illness. Poor communication between healthcare providers at hospital discharge is common and contributes to adverse events affecting patients after discharge. The importance of good communication at discharge will increase as more primary care providers delegate inpatient care to hospitalists. Any process that improves information transfer among providers at discharge might improve the health and safety of patients discharged from U.S. hospitals each year, and to appreciably reduce unnecessary healthcare expenditures. Information transfer among healthcare providers and their patients can be undermined because of inaccuracies, omissions, illegibility, logistical failure (e.g., information is never delivered), and delays in generation (i.e., dictation or transcription) or transmission. Root causes include recall error, increased physician workloads, interface failures (e.g., physician-clerical) and poor training of physicians in the discharge process. Many of the deficiencies in the current process of information transfer at hospital discharge could be effectively addressed by the application of information technology. The proposed study will measure the value of a software application to facilitate information transfer at hospital discharge. The study is designed to compare the benefits of discharge health information technology versus usual care in high-risk patients recently discharged from acute care hospitalization. The design is a randomized, single-blind, controlled trial. The outcomes are readmission within 6 months, adverse events, and effectiveness and satisfaction with the discharge process from the patient and physician perspectives. The cost outcome is the physician time required to use the discharge software.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesUnited States

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202520262027
First PostedJan 17, 2005
Enrollment StartDec 1, 2004
Primary CompletionAug 1, 2007
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 2.7 yearsPosted 21.5 years ago

Interventions

Discharge communication softwaredevice

Computerized physician order entry software used by discharging physician

Usual care discharge processother

Handwritten