At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison Record- ✓Soft tissue sarcoma diagnosis
- ✓Intermediate or high histologic grade
- ✓Tumor size greater than 5 cm
- ✓No evidence of metastasis
- ✕Prior chemotherapy
- ✕Specific excluded histologic types: clear cell, alveolar soft part, Ewing's rhabdosarcoma, undifferentiated small cell, or Kaposi's sarcoma
- ✕Active unstable angina pectoris
- ✕Concurrent therapy
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Phase II Evaluation of Ifosfamide Plus Doxorubicin & Filgrastim Versus Gemcitabine Plus Docetaxel & Filgrastim in the Treatment of Localized Poor Prognosis Soft Tissue Sarcoma
In Brief
A Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating ifosfamide and doxorubicin vs gemcitabine and docetaxel for Sarcoma, Soft Tissue. Completed, enrolled 84 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The purpose of this study is to explore how a sarcoma is affected by and the side effects of a newer combination of chemotherapy drugs(gemcitabine and docetaxel)as compared to a standard combination of chemotherapy drugs, ifosfamide and doxorubicin.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Arm 1 will consist of the two drug combination of doxorubicin and ifosfamide (with mesna) Treatment will be delivered over 3 days at 21 day intervals. Patients will receive filgrastim days 4-10 or peg-filgrastim on day 4 as a myeloid growth factor. Arm 2 will consist of the two drug combination of gemcitabine (day 1, 8) and docetaxel (day 8) repeated at 21 day intervals. Patients will receive filgrastim as a myeloid growth factor days 9-15 or peg-filgrastim on day 4. All patients will receive 4 cycles of chemotherapy unless there is unacceptable toxicity or disease progression that may adversely impact the surgical plan for complete resection.