At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Benefits of 'Repeat Back' Protocols Within A Computer-Based Informed Consent Program
In Brief
A Phase 1 clinical trial evaluating Enhanced surgical iMedConsent process (with "repeat back") and standard surgical iMedConsent process for Surgery and 4 related conditions. Completed, enrolled 575 participants across 7 sites.
Detailed Summary
This is a VA Merit Review Study involving 7 VA medical centers participating in a parallel group randomized trial comparing "repeat back" versus standard electronic consent for 4 common elective surgical procedures (total hip arthroplasty, carotid endarterectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and radical prostatectomy). Baseline covariates include health status (SF-12), reading ability (REALM), and demographics. Primary outcomes are patient comprehension of the informed consent, patient satisfaction with the informed consent and decision making processes, patient satisfaction with care, anxiety (STAI), and provider assessment of the "repeat back" process. In addition, we are electronically capturing data detailing time spent in each phase of the consent process including "repeat back".
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Consent process engages patient in discussion about why they are having procedure, risks, benefits, alternatives. Then provider asks patient to "repeat back"what they understand.
Patients are consented in standard VA consent process, where are not necessarily asked to repeat back and no discussion is necessarily documented.