At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 219 enrolled
Drug / intervention
SpeediCath +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
A Prospective, Randomized, Parallel-group, Multi-center Study to Compare the Occurrence of Urinary Tract Infections in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury Using Either Coated or Uncoated Intermittent Catheters.
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating SpeediCath and Conveen Uncoated for Urinary Tract Infections. Completed, enrolled 219 participants across 16 sites in 2 countries.
Detailed Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate the frequency of urinary tract infections with symptoms in spinal cord injured patients requiring intermittent catheterization for emptying the bladder. Patients will use either a coated catheter or an uncoated catheter with gel.
Study Details
Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsUrinary Tract Infections
CountriesCanada, United States
Collaborators--
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
2006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202520262027
Enrollment StartApr 2006
First PostedApr 2006
Primary CompletionOct 2009
TodayJul 2026
First PostedApr 27, 2006
Enrollment StartApr 1, 2006
Primary CompletionOct 1, 2009
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 3.5 yearsPosted 20.2 years ago
Interventions
SpeediCathdevice
hydrophilic coated urinary intermittent catheter
Conveen Uncoateddevice
Uncoated urinary intermittent catheter