CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 115 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Feeding tube insertionprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT00365703
NCT00365703N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

Nasogastric Tube vs. Orogastric Feeding Tube in Preterm Infants: Which is Best?

Hillel Yaffe Medical Center·interventional·Posted Aug 17, 2006·Updated Dec 19, 2007

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Feeding tube insertion for Infant, Premature. Completed, enrolled 115 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

The purpose of this study is to find out which method (nasogastric vs. orogastric) of feeding tube for premature infants results in earlier only oral feeding.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsInfant, Premature
CountriesIsrael
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202520262027
First PostedAug 17, 2006
Enrollment StartSep 1, 2006
Study CompletionAug 1, 2007
TodayJul 2, 2026
Posted 19.9 years ago

Interventions

Feeding tube insertionprocedure

1. Orogastric feeding tube 2. Nasogastric feeding tube