CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
Phase 3Completed
Drug / intervention
Transvaginal mesh- PROLIFT®-systemdevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT00402844
NCT00402844Phase 3Completed

A Multicenter Clinical Safety Assessment of Polypropylene Transvaginal Mesh in Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery

Karolinska Institutet·interventional·Posted Nov 22, 2006·Updated Nov 14, 2007

In Brief

A Phase 3 clinical trial evaluating Transvaginal mesh- PROLIFT®-system for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Completed, across 26 sites in 4 countries.

Detailed Summary

Pelvic organ prolapse is characterized by a lack of pelvic floor support causing the pelvic organs and vaginal walls to protrude. For decades, suture repair techniques have been the primary choice of surgical treatment when indicated. The notion of reinforcing pelvic floor defects using biomaterial implants is not an exclusively contemporary idea. Traditional surgical techniques are frequently associated with unsatisfying anatomical recurrence rates and over the years sporadic attempts have been made to introduce novel surgical techniques using a variety of biomaterials as support with varying success. It is plausible that inherently weak, or damaged, pelvic floor supportive tissues need to be reinforced by a permanent support to avoid the high rates of recurrences commonly described using traditional techniques. However, use of biomaterials in pelvic reconstructive surgery has become widespread in just a few years despite a lack of clinical safety data, or compelling clinical evidence demonstrating that it improves outcomes compared to traditional suture techniques. It is likely that biomaterials need to be "anchored" in tissues not afflicted by the disease, in order to provide the intended pelvic floor support. This has given rise to transvaginal surgical techniques using a transobturator approach passing the mesh through the arcus tendineous fascia pelvis, or the sacrospinous ligaments through a transgluteal approach. Already commercially available implant materials are in need of patient safety documentation, both when considering the surgical techniques by which these materials are placed in the body as well as the actual materials. Complication rates and perioperative morbidity using these surgical routes in pelvic organ prolapse surgery are generally unknown. The aim of the present study was to assess the long term morbidity, and describe the complications, associated with transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse using the PROLIFT®-system.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesDenmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden

Timeline

Phase 3CompletedFinished
200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202520262027
First PostedNov 22, 2006
Enrollment StartAug 1, 2006
Study CompletionMar 1, 2007
TodayJul 2, 2026
Posted 19.6 years ago

Interventions

Transvaginal mesh- PROLIFT®-systemdevice