CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 45 enrolled
Drug / intervention
nasal continuous positive airway pressureprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT00435643
NCT00435643N/ACompleted

Improvement in Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis Function After Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome

Federal University of São Paulo·interventional·Posted Feb 15, 2007·Updated Nov 20, 2007

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating nasal continuous positive airway pressure for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome and Obesity. Completed, enrolled 45 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Context: Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is associated with cardiovascular morbidity. Recurrent episodes of occlusion of upper airways during sleep result in hormonal changes that may predispose to high cardiovascular risk.These risks can rapidly be reduced by effective nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) therapy Objective: To evaluate hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis, insulin resistance, blood pressure values and adipokines in severe obese patients with and without OSAS and to determine if continuous positive airway pressure therapy (nCPAP) influenced responses.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesBrazil
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202520262027
First PostedFeb 15, 2007
Enrollment StartOct 1, 2004
Study CompletionMar 1, 2006
TodayJul 2, 2026
Posted 19.4 years ago

Interventions

nasal continuous positive airway pressureprocedure

After an average interval of three months, 10 patients with severe OSAS (AHI of more than 30 events per hour of sleep) treated with a mean nCPAP pressure of 11.2 ± 0.7 cm of H2O were reassessed and all mentioned measurements above were repeated