CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 37 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Not specified
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT00514553
NCT00514553N/ACompleted

Deliberation With and Without Attention: Can We Enhance Informed Choices About Invasive Prenatal Testing? A Proof of Principle Study

National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)·observational·Posted Aug 10, 2007·Updated Jul 2, 2017

In Brief

An observational study for Pregnancy - Prenatal Testing. Completed, enrolled 37 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

This study will compare the effectiveness of two interventions to help women make informed choices about whether or not to undergo an invasive procedure (amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling) for prenatal testing. The interventions are: 1) conscious deliberation (getting women to focus on and engage in the decision) and 2) unconscious deliberation (getting women not to focus on the decision). Studies suggest that some women are ambivalent about their decisions regarding invasive prenatal testing and those with the most ambivalence experience greater conflict about the decision. Techniques to reduce ambivalence through conscious or unconscious deliberation might lead to better informed choices. The two methods will also be compared with standard counseling for prenatal testing decisions. Women 18 years of age or older who are referred for prenatal genetic counseling to consider invasive prenatal testing and who have not previously undergone prenatal testing may be eligible for this study. Participants complete a questionnaire before and after receiving standard genetic counseling. They are then randomly assigned to one of three study groups: * Standard genetic counseling (control group): Receives no further intervention beyond standard counseling. * Conscious deliberation: Participants complete a form that focuses their attention on the pros and cons of invasive prenatal testing. This is followed by a brief questionnaire to evaluate time spent thinking about the session and the ease of completing the session. * Unconscious deliberation: Participants are provided a distraction task to complete during the session, such as a word or number puzzle and are told they will be asked about their decision regarding invasive prenatal testing at the end of the session. This is followed by a brief questionnaire to evaluate time spent thinking about the session and the ease of completing the session. Participants are contacted by telephone 1 month after the counseling session to find out what they decided regarding invasive prenatal testing and to assess any conflict they experienced about the decision. ...

Study Details

Study Typeobservational
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202520262027
First PostedAug 10, 2007
Enrollment StartAug 7, 2007
Study CompletionMay 31, 2011
TodayJul 2, 2026
Posted 18.9 years ago