At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 97 enrolled
Drug / intervention
OsseoSpeed™ length 6 mm +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
An Open, Prospective, Randomized, Multi-center Study Comparing OsseoSpeed™ Implant 6 mm With OsseoSpeed™ Implant 11 mm in the Posterior Maxilla and Mandible. A 5-year Follow-up Study.
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating OsseoSpeed™ length 6 mm and OsseoSpeed™ length 11 mm for Jaw, Edentulous, Partially. Completed, enrolled 97 participants across 6 sites in 5 countries.
Detailed Summary
The purpose of this study is to see if OsseoSpeed™ implant 6 mm long is effective for rehabilitation of edentulism and if so, how it compares with OsseoSpeed™ implant 11 mm long. The primary hypothesis is that the alteration in bone level is equal in patients randomized to 6 mm as to patients randomized to 11 mm implants.
Study Details
Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsJaw, Edentulous, Partially
CountriesAustralia, Netherlands, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States
Collaborators--
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202520262027
First PostedOct 2007
Enrollment StartNov 2007
Primary CompletionMay 2016
TodayJul 2026
First PostedOct 17, 2007
Enrollment StartNov 1, 2007
Primary CompletionMay 1, 2016
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 8.5 yearsPosted 18.7 years ago
Interventions
OsseoSpeed™ length 6 mmdevice
OsseoSpeed™ dental implant, length: 6 mm
OsseoSpeed™ length 11 mmdevice
OsseoSpeed™ dental implant, length: 11 mm