At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
An International Randomised Trial of Early Versus Delayed Invasive Strategies in Patients With Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Early Coronary Intervention and Delayed Coronary Intervention for Unstable Angina and Myocardial Infarction. Completed, enrolled 3,031 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The timing of intervention study is a prospective, randomized, international, multicentre comparison of the relative efficacy, safety, and cost effectiveness of a management strategy of coronary angiography and intervention performed within 24 hours of randomization versus delayed coronary angiography and intervention in patients after 36 hours with acute coronary syndromes (ACS).
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Perform coronary angiography and intervention (either percutaneous coronary intervention \[PCI\] or coronary artery bypass graft \[CABG\] surgery) as soon as possible (and within 24 hours of randomisation).
Perform coronary angiography and intervention (either percutaneous coronary intervention \[PCI\] or coronary artery bypass graft \[CABG\] surgery) any time after 36 hours after randomisation.