CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
Phase 2Completed· 54 enrolled
Drug / intervention
IMRT +1 moreradiation
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT00581256
NCT00581256Phase 2Completed

A Randomized Comparison of Radiation Therapy Techniques in the Management of Node Positive Breast Cancer

University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center·interventional·Posted Dec 27, 2007·Updated Oct 31, 2017

In Brief

A Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating IMRT and 3D for Breast Cancer. Completed, enrolled 54 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Radiotherapy has been shown to reduce breast-cancer specific mortality in patients at high risk for distant dissemination. It has also been shown to increase rates of non-breast cancer deaths and morbidity due to cardiovascular and pulmonary toxicity. Although treatment planning has improved significantly through the years, recent reports still demonstrate treatment-related morbidity even with 3-dimensional planned techniques. Thus, while 3D planning represents the state of the art treatment for loco-regional radiotherapy for breast cancer, further improvement is needed to continue to decrease heart and lung exposure. The ultimate goal of the proposed research is to determine whether treatment planning using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), the "next generation" of radiation treatment delivery systems, results in less radiation exposure to the heart and lungs than the best current RT technique in women with node positive breast cancer. This proposal will test the potential clinical value of IMRT compared to the best standard 3D plan (partially wide tangent fields, PWTF) in the treatment of breast cancer. These two treatment techniques will be studied in a Phase II randomized trial using quantitative indicators of potential cardiac and lung toxicity. The preliminary data generated from this trial will be used to ultimately justify a multi-institutional comparison of the two treatment techniques with long-term clinical cardiac and pulmonary toxicity as endpoints.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsBreast Cancer
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--

Timeline

Phase 2CompletedFinished
2006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202520262027
First PostedDec 27, 2007
Enrollment StartApr 1, 2006
Primary CompletionApr 1, 2015
Study CompletionApr 1, 2016
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 9 yearsPosted 18.5 years ago

Interventions

IMRTradiation

All patients treated with the optimized plan will be treated to the entire target volume to 52.2 Gy in 1.74 Gy fractions, which is biologically equivalent to 50 Gy in 2 Gy fractions. This fractionation scheme will allow the boost of 10 Gy to be incorporated into the planning directive and to be delivered simultaneously with the treatment to the remaining target volume.

3Dradiation

All patients treated using the best standard technique will receive 50 Gy in 2 Gy fractions or 50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions to the entire target volume delivering one treatment per day, five fractions per week (excluding holidays). A boost of 10 Gy to the tumor bed of an intact breast will be delivered. Patients treated to the chest wall will receive a 10Gy scar boost if mastectomy margins are positive in a patient with Stage II disease or if the patient was originally diagnosed with T3 or T4 (Stage III) disease