At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 4,231 enrolled
Drug / intervention
AutoPulse +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Autopulse To Manual CPR In A CPR-First Protocol For Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating AutoPulse and Manual for Cardiac Arrest and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Completed, enrolled 4,231 participants across 5 sites in 3 countries.
Detailed Summary
During resuscitation of out of hospital cardiac arrest patients the use of a mechanical chest compression device Autopulse will improve survival compared to manual compressions.
Study Details
Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsCardiac Arrest, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
CountriesAustria, Netherlands, United States
CollaboratorsUllevaal University Hospital
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202520262027
Enrollment StartJan 2008
First PostedJan 2008
Primary CompletionFeb 2011
Study CompletionDec 2013
TodayJul 2026
First PostedJan 17, 2008
Enrollment StartJan 1, 2008
Primary CompletionFeb 1, 2011
Study CompletionDec 1, 2013
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 3.1 yearsPosted 18.5 years ago
Interventions
AutoPulsedevice
Mechanical device that provides chest compression
Manualother
Manual chest compression