At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
A Prospective, Multi-Center Study to Assess the AMS Pelvic Floor Repair System Devices for Prolapse Repair
In Brief
An observational study evaluating AMS Apogee™ with IntePro, AMS Apogee™ with Intexen LP, and 7 other interventions for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Completed, enrolled 725 participants across 28 sites in 7 countries.
Detailed Summary
1. This is a prospective, multi-center, post market study, which will be conducted under a common protocol. 2. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate long-term efficacy of the AMS Pelvic Floor Repair System devices for prolapse repair. 3. The study population is female subjects \> 21 years of age who require surgical reconstruction of their pelvic floor due to prolapse. 4. The clinical data will be analyzed by comparing post-treatment data with the baseline data, with the subject acting as her own control. The follow-up is for two years after the procedure. 5. Prolapse improvement measured by ICS POP-Q Stage at 12-months will be the primary endpoint of the study. The secondary endpoints include quality of life changes from baseline and adverse event rates.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Mesh implant for posterior wall pelvic organ prolapse
Graft implant for posterior wall pelvic organ prolapse
Mesh implant for anterior wall pelvic organ prolapse
Mesh implant for anterior wall pelvic organ prolapse
Mesh implant for posterior wall pelvic organ prolapse
Mesh implant for apical and posterior wall pelvic organ prolapse
Graft implant for apical and posterior wall pelvic organ prolapse
Mesh implant for anteiror and apical wall pelvic organ prolapse
Mesh implant for anteiror and apical wall pelvic organ prolapse