At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 100 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy +1 moreprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: a Clinical Randomized Trial Comparing Conventional and Robot-assisted(Da Vinci®)Techniques
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Robot-assisted (Da Vinci®) laparoscopic hysterectomy for Laparoscopic Technique no Switch to Open and 3 related conditions. Completed, enrolled 100 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The aim of this study is to compare conventional with robot-assisted (Da Vinci®) laparoscopic hysterectomy regarding operating time peri-operative outcome and costs.
Study Details
Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsLaparoscopic Technique no Switch to Open, Duration of Surgery, Intraoperative Complications, Postoperative Complications
CountriesSwitzerland
Collaborators--
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202520262027
First PostedMay 2008
Enrollment StartNov 2008
Primary CompletionSep 2011
Study CompletionDec 2011
TodayJul 2026
First PostedMay 23, 2008
Enrollment StartNov 1, 2008
Primary CompletionSep 1, 2011
Study CompletionDec 1, 2011
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 2.8 yearsPosted 18.1 years ago
Interventions
Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomyprocedure
Removal of uterus via standard laparoscopic techniques
Robot-assisted (Da Vinci®) laparoscopic hysterectomyprocedure
Removal of uterus by robot-assisted laparoscopic technique