CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
Phase 4Completed· 50 target
Drug / intervention
Glargine +1 moredrug
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT00699686
NCT00699686Phase 4Completed

Effects of Optimized Glycemic Control Achieved With add-on Basal Insulin Therapy on Indexes of Endothelial Damage and Regeneration in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Macroangiopathy. A Randomized Cross-over Trial Comparing Detemir vs Glargine

University of Padova·interventional·Posted Jun 18, 2008·Updated Aug 17, 2010

In Brief

A Phase 4 clinical trial evaluating Glargine and Detemir for Type 2 Diabetes and 2 related conditions. Completed, enrolled 50 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) level represents a surrogate marker of cardiovascular risk and an indicator of the ongoing vascular damage. Moreover, EPCs are involved in the pathogenesis of virtually all diabetic complications. Therefore, ways to modulate EPCs are currently considered of utmost importance, especially in high-risk subjects. While many drugs with pleiotropic vasculoprotective effects have shown ability to positively modulate EPCs, there is no data on the effects of specific insulin formulations. This is a human randomised cross-over comparison trial. The purpose is to compare the effects of two basal insulin analogues (detemir and glargine) added to oral antidiabetic therapy in poorly-controlled type 2 patients with cardiovascular disease on endothelial function and EPC levels. The aim is to test whether optimized glycemic control with add-on basal insulin analogues improves endothelial damage and regeneration in type 2 diabetes with macroangiopathy and to compare the effects of glargine vs detemir on markers of endothelial damage and regeneration. EPC level is the most innovative outcome measure of this study and represents the primary endpoint. Endothelial dysfunction/damage, evaluated using soluble markers, will be the secondary outcome. Given the supposed inverse correlation between EPC and endothelial damage, it is expected that EPC increase reflects amelioration in endothelial biology, a result that may have significant clinical implications in this cohort of high-risk patients.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesItaly
Collaborators--

Timeline

Phase 4CompletedFinished
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202520262027
First PostedJun 18, 2008
Enrollment StartMay 1, 2008
Primary CompletionMar 1, 2010
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.8 yearsPosted 18.0 years ago

Interventions

Glarginedrug

Daily bedtime subcutaneous insulin Glargine in individualized doses.

Detemirdrug

Daily bedtime subcutaneous insulin Detemir in individualized doses.