CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 40 enrolled
Drug / intervention
NuvaRing +1 moredrug
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT00710606
NCT00710606N/ACompleted

Comparison of Serum Contraceptive Hormone Levels Between Normal Weight and Obese Users of the NuvaRing®

Columbia University·interventional·Posted Jul 4, 2008·Updated Apr 30, 2015

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating NuvaRing for Pharmacokinetics. Completed, enrolled 40 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

There are over 60 million women of reproductive age in the U.S. and a majority of these women qualify as overweight or obese. Evidence suggests that there is an association between increased body weight and decreased contraceptive efficacy. Studies with the combined hormonal contraceptive patch (Evra®) and the subdermal contraceptive implant (Norplant®) demonstrate higher failure rates in heavier versus lighter women. Weight related differences in the effectiveness of NuvaRing® need further study. A single secondary analysis of pooled data from Phase III clinical trials of NuvaRing® noted no difference in pregnancy rates among women in the highest weight decile (\>166#) versus the rest of the study population using the ring. (Westhoff, 2005) The finding of no difference, however, was influenced by too few obese subjects in the analysis which contributed to wide confidence limits. Additional studies are needed to explore how well the contraceptive ring functions to maintain effective serum steroid concentrations to suppress ovarian activity in obese women. This investigation focused on evaluating mean serum concentrations of hormones released in obese and normal weight women using the NuvaRing® . This study was a prospective clinical trial. Normal weight women are defined as women with a BMI 19-24.9 and obese women are those with a BMI 30-39.9. We recruited forty adult women interested in initiating the combined hormonal contraceptive ring to two months of use to complete analysis of at least 34 subjects (17 normal weight, 17 obese). We compared mean serum concentrations of ethinyl estradiol (E2) and etonogestrel (ENG) along with additional markers for ovarian suppression. These markers included sonographic evidence of follicular development and ovulation as well as circulating E2 levels which strongly correlate with follicular development and endometrial proliferation during the second month of NuvaRing® use. Assessment of these parameters will translated to understanding contraceptive-mediated suppression of ovarian function in these two groups. Subjects also logged patterns of ring use and bleeding patterns during the study period.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesUnited States
CollaboratorsOrganon

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202520262027
First PostedJul 4, 2008
Enrollment StartJun 1, 2008
Primary CompletionDec 1, 2008
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 6 monthsPosted 18.0 years ago

Interventions

NuvaRingdrug

Obese subjects (BMI 30-39.9) will receive two contraceptive hormonal rings. During the second cycle of ring use, subjects will return to the study site for serial serum hormone measurements and transvaginal ultrasound twice weekly during four weeks of continuous use.

NuvaRingdrug

Normal weight subjects will also receive two contraceptive hormonal rings. During the second cycle of ring use, subjects will return to the study site for serial serum hormone measurements and transvaginal ultrasound twice weekly during four weeks of continuous use.