At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Trial of Low And High Intensity Strategies to Maintain Blood Pressure Control
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating High Intensity Intervention, Low Intensity Intervention, and 1 other intervention for Hypertension. Completed, enrolled 249 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The long-range goal of this research is to advance understanding of long-term blood pressure (BP) control in patients with uncontrolled hypertension (HTN). The work builds on our experience in implementing new models of care in Veterans Affairs (VA) and non-VA settings, including three National Institute of Health (NIH) studies of pharmacist-based HTN management. The long-term effectiveness of such models, especially in veterans, is unknown. Thus, the primary goal of this study is to evaluate how to sustain long-term BP control in veterans with HTN following a 6-month intensive pharmacist intervention. This study will enroll veterans with uncontrolled HTN into a 6-month intensive pharmacist-based intervention. Following this initial intervention, participants will be randomized to continued intervention or a one-time patient and provider education intervention. BP will be compared in the two groups over a 2-year follow-up period. The intervention to control and sustain BP will follow VA guidelines and include: 1) comprehensive medication assessment by the pharmacist; 2) an explicit plan to intensify treatment if indicated; 3) strategies to improve adherence; and 4) follow-up pharmacist visits to sustain BP control. The intervention is based on models identified in a recent Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) report as being the most potent strategies to improve BP. The study will benefit from a strong research team with expertise in guideline development, implementation science, quality measurement, and behavioral science. The study will also provide important information on the degree to which BP control deteriorates after patients are referred back to usual care. The specific aims and related hypotheses of the study are to: Aim 1:Compare BP control in patients randomized to long-term continuation of the pharmacist intervention or to a less intense one-time patient and provider education intervention. Hypothesis 1a: Patients randomized to the continued pharmacist intervention will have higher rates of BP control 24 months after randomization. Hypothesis 1b: Patients randomized to the continued pharmacist intervention will have lower mean BP 24 months after randomization. Aim 2: Compare antihypertensive medication intensification in patients randomized to the continued pharmacist intervention or the less intense intervention. Hypothesis 2: A higher proportion of patients who continued the pharmacist intervention will have medication intensification over the 24-month follow-up. Aim 3: Compare medication adherence in the two intervention groups. Hypothesis 3a: Medication adherence will be higher in patients randomized to the continued pharmacist intervention group during the 24 month follow-up period. Hypothesis 3b: Improvements in medication adherence will be associated with improvements in BP during each study interval.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
High Intensity patients will be seen by the pharmacist at 3-6 month intervals, depending upon if patient is at goal BP. During these visits, the pharmacist will: 1) review barriers to BP control; 2) assess progress toward overcoming such barriers; 3) determine adherence; and 4) assess potential side effects. If the BP is at goal, the patient will be given encouragement and told to continue the regimen. If the BP is not at goal, the pharmacist will develop a new treatment strategy. If the treatment changes were in the plan negotiated with the physician, the PCP will simply be informed. If new changes are recommended, the pharmacist will develop a new treatment plan and review it with the PCP.
Low intensity group will receive management by their PCP and a 3-part intervention that was effective in a recent VA study. This one-time intervention will occur 3 months after completion of the initial 6-month pharmacist intervention and will include: Provider education including an email message to re-evaluate the specific patient's BP regimen and a web link to the VA/JNC-7 hypertension guidelines. 1-time patient-specific computerized alert reminding the PCP of the goal BP, values of the patient's last 3 BP assessments, \& possible options for medication changes if BP does not remain at goal. Patient education including a personalized letter with information on strategies to improve BP control, including medication adherence, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet/exercise. The letter will note that many patients require more than one medication and will provide a link to the VA patient education web library and American Heart Association (AHA) site.
All patients will receive the initial 6-month pharmacist intervention. The intervention: 1) co-management of HTN by pharmacists can improve BP control; and 2) active follow-up is needed to reinforce progress and proactively identify and resolve problems. The intervention will include structured visits at baseline 1, 2, 4, and 6 months after baseline and telephone calls at 2 weeks and between the visits. At baseline, the pharmacist will review the computerized patient record system (CPRS) medical record and perform a structured interview, including: a detailed medication history of all prescription and non-prescription therapies; an assessment of patient knowledge of all meds, the purpose of each med, medication dosages and timing, and potential side effects; potential contraindications to specific medications; and expectations for future dosage changes and of the need for future monitoring potential barriers to BP control.