At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 141 enrolled
Drug / intervention
OsseoSpeed™ +2 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Prospective, Comparative Assessment of Single-tooth Replacement in Different Implant-abutment Settings
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating OsseoSpeed™, NobelSpeedy™ Replace®, and 1 other intervention for Jaw, Edentulous, Partially. Completed, enrolled 141 participants across 4 sites in 2 countries.
Detailed Summary
The primary objective is to compare the gum response to three different dental implant designs when placed in the front region of the upper jaw. The changes from baseline to one year after will be compared. The null-hypothesis is that the buccal soft tissue (gum) changes from baseline to one year after are equal for all three implant-abutment interface settings.
Study Details
Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsJaw, Edentulous, Partially
CountriesCanada, United States
Collaborators--
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedJan 2009
Enrollment StartFeb 2009
Primary CompletionSep 2016
TodayJul 2026
First PostedJan 12, 2009
Enrollment StartFeb 1, 2009
Primary CompletionSep 1, 2016
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 7.6 yearsPosted 17.5 years ago
Interventions
OsseoSpeed™device
OsseoSpeed™ implant
NobelSpeedy™ Replace®device
NobelSpeedy™ Replace® implant
NanoTite™ Certain® PREVAIL®device
NanoTite™ Certain® PREVAIL® implant