At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Pressure as a Primary Mode for Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation for Prematurity and Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Completed, enrolled 200 participants across 2 sites.
Detailed Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the hypothesis that nasal intermittent positive pressure(NIPP), used as a primary mode of ventilation in preterm infants with RDS, will decrease the need for conventional endotracheal ventilation when compared to nasal continuous positive airway pressure.(NCPAP)
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Nasal intermittent positive airway pressure will be compared are the nasal continuous positive pressure as an initial ventilatory mode in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome