CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
Phase 4Completed· 603 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Parietex Progrip +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT00827944
NCT00827944Phase 4Completed
CompareCT.gov

ProGrip Mesh Repair Versus Lichtenstein Mesh Repair: a Comparative Randomized Study in Primary Inguinal Hernia

Medtronic - MITG·interventional·Posted Jan 23, 2009·Updated Nov 17, 2016

In Brief

A Phase 4 clinical trial evaluating Parietex Progrip and Low weight polypropylene mesh for Hernia, Inguinal. Completed, enrolled 603 participants across 9 sites in 5 countries.

Detailed Summary

The objective of the study is to evaluate pain and disabling complications inducing social consequences in primary inguinal hernia ProGrip mesh repair compared to Lichtenstein repair with lightweight polypropylene mesh.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsHernia, Inguinal
CountriesBelgium, Germany, Netherlands, Sweden, United Kingdom
Collaborators--

Timeline

Phase 4CompletedFinished
200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedJan 23, 2009
Enrollment StartOct 1, 2008
Primary CompletionOct 1, 2012
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 4 yearsPosted 17.4 years ago

Interventions

Parietex Progripdevice

Surgical technique: Self-gripping lightweight Polyester and Polylactic acid meshes providing a sutureless fixation.

Low weight polypropylene meshdevice

Surgical technique: Lichtenstein repair with lightweight polypropylene mesh (inferior to 70gr/m2) secured to the posterior inguinal wall with sutures