At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 66 enrolled
Drug / intervention
VPAP Adapt SVdevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Is Adaptive Servo-Ventilation Therapeutically More Effective Than Continuous Positive Airway Pressure In Treating Complex Sleep Apnea Syndrome?
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating VPAP Adapt SV for Complex Sleep Apnea Syndrome. Completed, enrolled 66 participants across 6 sites.
Detailed Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is better at treating complex sleep apnea over time.
Study Details
Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsComplex Sleep Apnea Syndrome
CountriesUnited States
CollaboratorsMayo Clinic
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Enrollment StartMay 2009
First PostedJun 2009
Primary CompletionOct 2011
Study CompletionDec 2011
TodayJul 2026
First PostedJun 8, 2009
Enrollment StartMay 1, 2009
Primary CompletionOct 1, 2011
Study CompletionDec 1, 2011
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 2.4 yearsPosted 17.1 years ago
Interventions
VPAP Adapt SVdevice
Comparison of ASV and CPAP modes