At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 37 enrolled
Drug / intervention
ARTAS™ System +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Safety and Efficacy of Computer-Assisted vs. Manual Hair Follicle Harvest: A Comparative Hair Count Study
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating ARTAS™ System and Manual Hair Harvest for Androgenetic Alopecia. Completed, enrolled 37 participants across 2 sites.
Detailed Summary
The objective of this clinical study is to investigate and compare the safety and efficacy of the Restoration Robotics Computer-Assisted Harvesting System to the manual hair follicle harvesting method following a nine-month period of post-procedural evaluation.
Study Details
Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsAndrogenetic Alopecia
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Enrollment StartJun 2009
First PostedJun 2009
Primary CompletionSep 2010
TodayJul 2026
First PostedJun 23, 2009
Enrollment StartJun 1, 2009
Primary CompletionSep 1, 2010
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.3 yearsPosted 17.0 years ago
Interventions
ARTAS™ Systemdevice
Hair harvest using a computer-assisted system
Manual Hair Harvestprocedure
Hair harvesting via the manual technique