At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Randomized Controlled Trial of Continuous vs. Cyclic Stimulation in Interstim Therapy
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Interstim (SNS) for Urge Incontinence. Completed, enrolled 32 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
Sacral Nerve Stimulation (SNS) delivers non-painful, mild electrical pulses to the sacral nerves to modulate the reflexes that influence the bladder, sphincter, and pelvic floor to improve or restore normal voiding function. Sacral nerve stimulation is indicated for refractory voiding dysfunction including urinary urgency/frequency, urinary urge incontinence, and nonobstructive urinary retention. Since its introduction, SNS has undergone significant improvements in design and application so that implantation is now a minimally invasive procedure under local and intravenous (IV) sedation. However, despite the progress made in advancing this therapy to a minimally invasive procedure, there are neither data nor guidelines on ideal program settings. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the programming parameter of cyclic versus continuous stimulation on efficacy of the therapy. If the therapy is equally efficacious at both settings, the cyclic setting has the advantage of resulting in a longer battery life.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Randomized Controlled Trial of Continuous vs. Cyclic Stimulation in Interstim Therapy