CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 300 enrolled
Drug / intervention
CMAC video laryngoscope +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT00956592
NCT00956592N/ACompleted

A Randomized Control Trial to Determine First Attempt Intubation Success With the CMAC Laryngoscope vs. Macintosh Blade in Airways Predicted to be Difficult

Oregon Health and Science University·interventional·Posted Aug 11, 2009·Updated Apr 5, 2018

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating CMAC video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope for Intubation and Airway Management. Completed, enrolled 300 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

This study aims to evaluate the utility of a video assisted device for intubation (placement of a breathing tube) during surgery. This study specifically aims to compare a video assisted intubation with the CMAC laryngoscope to conventional devices in the setting of intubations predicted to be difficult.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedAug 11, 2009
Enrollment StartOct 1, 2009
Primary CompletionDec 1, 2010
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.2 yearsPosted 16.9 years ago

Interventions

CMAC video laryngoscopedevice

Intubation utilizing the assistance of video enhancement

Macintosh laryngoscopedevice

Patients will be intubated utilizing either a Macintosh 3 or Macintosh 4 designed blade