At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 36 enrolled
Drug / intervention
test intermittent catheter +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
A Randomised, Cross-over, Open-labelled Study Evaluating the Acceptance of Test Catheters Compared to SpeediCath Catheters
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating test intermittent catheter and Intermittent catheterization for Spinal Cord Injuries. Completed, enrolled 36 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate that the test catheter is no less accepted than the SpeediCath (SC) catheter.
Study Details
Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsSpinal Cord Injuries
CountriesDenmark
Collaborators--
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
20102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedOct 2009
Enrollment StartNov 2009
Primary CompletionMar 2010
TodayJul 2026
First PostedOct 6, 2009
Enrollment StartNov 1, 2009
Primary CompletionMar 1, 2010
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 4 monthsPosted 16.7 years ago
Interventions
test intermittent catheterdevice
CH 12 hydrophilic coated catheter
Intermittent catheterizationdevice
CH 12 hydrophilic catheter