CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 60 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Non application of nasogastric tube in the experimental groupother
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT01011023
NCT01011023N/ACompleted

Unnecessary Gastric Decompression in Distal Elective Bowel Anastomoses in Children. A Randomized Study

Hospital Infantil de Mexico Federico Gomez·interventional·Posted Nov 11, 2009·Updated Nov 11, 2009

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Non application of nasogastric tube in the experimental group for Unnecessary Nasogastric Tube and Bowel Anastomosis. Completed, enrolled 60 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Objective. To study the role of nasogastric drainage to prevent postoperative complications in children with \<b\>distal\</b\> elective bowel anastomosis. Summary Background Data. Nasogastric drainage has been used as a routine measure after gastrointestinal surgery in children and adults, to hasten bowel function, prevent post operative complications and shorten hospital stay. However, there is no former study that states in a scientific manner its benefit in children. Methods. The investigators performed a clinical controlled, randomized trial, comprising 60 children that underwent distal elective bowel anastomoses comparing post operative complications between a group with nasogastric tube in place (n=29) and one without it (n=31). \<b\>As an equivalence study the investigators expected that the two techniques were equivalent.\</b\> Statistics: Descriptive statistics for global description. Student's t test for quantitative variables and chi square test for qualitative variables. Considering statistically significant a p-value less than 0.05. \<b\>Being an equivalence study, the default delta generated by the Stata command "equim" was used to demonstrate the equivalence between both groups.\</b\> Results: Demographic data and diagnosis were comparable in both groups (p=NS). No anastomotic leakage or entero-cutaneous fistulae was found in any patient. The investigators demonstrated equivalency since each confidence interval is entirely contained within delta, except for one variable (beginning deambulation), in which equivalency is suggested. There were no significant differences between groups in abdominal distention, infection, or hospital stay variables. Only one patient in the experimental group required placement of the nasogastric tube due to persistent abdominal distension (3.2%). Conclusions. The routine use of nasogastric drainage can be eliminated after distal elective intestinal surgery in children. It's use should be individualized.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesMexico
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
2000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202520262027
First PostedNov 11, 2009
Enrollment StartSep 1, 2000
Primary CompletionApr 1, 2001
Study CompletionNov 1, 2001
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 7 monthsPosted 16.6 years ago

Interventions

Non application of nasogastric tube in the experimental groupother

Avoid the 5 post operative application of nasogastric tube in the experimental group vs the control group with the usual nasogastric tube