At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
A Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Trial Comparing the Clinical Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty by a Single Surgeon Using Either a Mini-posterior Approach or a Direct Anterior Approach
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Mini-Posterior surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty and Direct Anterior surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis. Completed, enrolled 66 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The purpose is to determine if differences exist in the attainment of functional milestones that reflect activities of daily living between mini-posterior and direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty (THA). The investigators also hope to determine if the general health outcome after direct anterior total hip arthroplasty was better than that after mini-posterior-incision total hip arthroplasty as measured with Short Form-12 (SF-12) scores, and to evaluate variation of surgical factors of the two procedures on the basis of the operative time, component positioning, and occurrence of early complications.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Mini-Posterior surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty
Direct Anterior surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty