CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 28 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Operator Role Real TMS +4 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT01030133
NCT01030133N/ACompleted

Effects of TMS and Stimulus Controllability on Pain Perception

Medical University of South Carolina·interventional·Posted Dec 11, 2009·Updated Sep 28, 2018

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Operator Role Real TMS, Receiver Role Real TMS, and 3 other interventions for Chronic Pain. Completed, enrolled 28 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Although transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is now considered a minimal risk intervention, is approved for the treatment of depression, and is widely used around the world, little is known about mechanisms of action of prefrontal rTMS for depression or pain. There is some evidence that the prefrontal cortex is involved in perception of control and may moderate the effects of perceived controllability on emotional reactivity to painful stimuli. The present study aims to investigate the effects of prefrontal rTMS and perceived controllability on pain perception in healthy adults.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsChronic Pain
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedDec 11, 2009
Enrollment StartOct 1, 2009
Primary CompletionJan 1, 2010
Study CompletionFeb 1, 2010
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 3 monthsPosted 16.6 years ago

Interventions

Operator Role Real TMSdevice

In two of the four visits, the participant will be assigned to the operator condition receiving Real TMS. The participant will be assigned a partner and both participants will participate in a numeric-combination-guessing task. Performance on this task will be directly related to the painfulness of a series of thermal stimuli that participants receive. The "operator's" performance will control the painfulness delivered to both participants. Each participant will play each role twice.

Receiver Role Real TMSdevice

In two of the four visits, the participant will be assigned to the receiver condition receiving Real TMS. The participant will be assigned a partner and both participants will participate in a numeric-combination-guessing task. Performance on this task will be directly related to the painfulness of a series of thermal stimuli that participants receive. The "receiver's" performance on the task will be unrelated to his/her stimulus painfulness. Each participant will play each role twice.

Operator Role Sham TMSdevice

In two of the four visits, the participant will be assigned to the operator condition receiving Sham TMS. The participant will be assigned a partner and both participants will participate in a numeric-combination-guessing task. Performance on this task will be directly related to the painfulness of a series of thermal stimuli that participants receive. The "operator's" performance will control the painfulness delivered to both participants. Each participant will play each role twice.

Receiver Role Sham TMSdevice

In two of the four visits, the participant will be assigned to the receiver condition receiving Sham TMS. The participant will be assigned a partner and both participants will participate in a numeric-combination-guessing task. Performance on this task will be directly related to the painfulness of a series of thermal stimuli that participants receive. The "receiver's" performance on the task will be unrelated to his/her stimulus painfulness. Each participant will play each role twice.

All Participants Operator Roledevice

All participants in Operator Role (Receiving real or sham TMS)