CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 100 target
Drug / intervention
Vascular Access Decision Aidbehavioral
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT01032551
NCT01032551N/ACompleted

Vascular Access Options in Coronary Angiogram Procedures: A Patient Decision Aid Randomized Controlled Trial

Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation·interventional·Posted Dec 15, 2009·Updated Jan 19, 2011

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Vascular Access Decision Aid for Coronary Artery Disease and Atherosclerosis. Completed, enrolled 100 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Coronary angiogram (CA) procedures, with and without angioplasty, can be performed via vascular access in the wrist (radial artery) or leg (femoral artery). Both radial and femoral artery vascular access have their advantages and disadvantages, but neither has yet been proven to have superior health outcomes. Often patients are eligible for both access sites but are not well informed regarding the potential advantages and disadvantages of each site. Vascular access in cardiac catheterization can be considered a "grey zone", where the benefits and harms may have different levels of significance depending on the individual's preferences and values. For example, patients with significant back pain may not prefer the femoral approach as it requires the patient to lie flay for an extended period of time compared to the radial approach. For "grey zone" health care options, Patient Decision Aids (PtDA) have been demonstrated to improve the quality of decision making by significantly improving knowledge of the patient's health care options, improving the patient's accurate risk perception, and improving value congruence with the chosen options. The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the decision quality impact of a vascular access PtDA compared to "usual care" in eligible patient's undergoing elective CA procedures. If the PtDA is demonstrated to positively impact the decision quality of patients prior to CA procedures, it would be an invaluable bedside tool to promote patient informed medical decision making. Hypothesis: The investigators believe that a PtDA, when compared to usual care, will positively impact the decision quality and the process of decision making, relating to vascular access options in eligible patients undergoing elective CA procedures.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesCanada

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedDec 15, 2009
Enrollment StartJun 1, 2010
Primary CompletionDec 1, 2010
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 6 monthsPosted 16.5 years ago

Interventions

Vascular Access Decision Aidbehavioral

The intervention group will receive a PtDA addressing vascular access for CA procedures. The PtDA is a brief lay summary that outlines, the purpose of the PtDA, a description of both femoral and radial approaches for CA procedures, what to expect from both approaches, the known risks/benefits of each access site (including a grading of the evidence), and a short assessment of the patients values. The values assessment is included in the PtDA as a means to help guide the patient through the decision making process. This section will ask the patient to explicitly state which features, risks, and benefits of each approach are important to them.