At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 92 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Necessity endotracheal suctioning +1 moreprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Differences in Morbidity Frequency Between a Necessity Endotracheal Suctioning Protocol Versus a Routine Endotracheal Suctioning Protocol in Hospital Pablo Tobon Uribe´s Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). A Randomized Controlled Trial
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Necessity endotracheal suctioning and Routine endotracheal suctioning for Hypoxemia and 3 related conditions. Completed, enrolled 92 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
Morbidity frequency associated to a endotracheal suctioning is different between a necessity endotracheal suctioning protocol versus a routine endotracheal protocol.
Study Details
Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesColombia
Collaborators--
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
20102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Enrollment StartFeb 2010
First PostedFeb 2010
Primary CompletionAug 2010
TodayJul 2026
First PostedFeb 17, 2010
Enrollment StartFeb 1, 2010
Primary CompletionAug 1, 2010
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 6 monthsPosted 16.4 years ago
Interventions
Necessity endotracheal suctioningprocedure
Endotracheal suctioning depends on clinical manifestations
Routine endotracheal suctioningprocedure
Endotracheal suctioning every two hours