CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 50 enrolled
Drug / intervention
C-MAC direct laryngoscopy +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT01104090
NCT01104090N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

Initial Experience With Storz C-MAC Video Intubation System

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston·interventional·Posted Apr 15, 2010·Updated Nov 1, 2021

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating C-MAC direct laryngoscopy and C-MAC Indirect laryngoscopy for Intubation; Difficult. Completed, enrolled 50 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of the C-MAC (Karl Storz Endoscopy, Inc., Tuttlingen, Germany) video intubation system guided intubation techniques. We hypothesize that the C-MAC video laryngoscope is safe and efficacious in terms of successful endotracheal intubation. The C-MAC may be a safe and suitable alternative device for routine and difficult laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. This is the first study to investigate the performance of C-MAC in clinical practice.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsIntubation; Difficult
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedApr 15, 2010
Enrollment StartFeb 1, 2010
Primary CompletionSep 1, 2010
Study CompletionFeb 1, 2012
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 7 monthsPosted 16.2 years ago

Interventions

C-MAC direct laryngoscopydevice

Patients will be intubated using C-MAC with direct laryngoscopy.

C-MAC Indirect laryngoscopydevice

Patients will be intubated using C-MAC with indirect laryngoscopy.