At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
A Multicenter Comparative Study of the ReCell Device and Autologous Split-thickness Meshed Skin Graft in the Treatment of Acute Burn Injuries
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating ReCell and Split-thickness skin graft for Burns. Completed, enrolled 101 participants across 12 sites.
Detailed Summary
This is a randomized, within-patient controlled study to compare the clinical performance of the ReCell Device with that of Split-thickness Meshed Skin Grafts for the treatment of second degree burns. The hypothesis to be supported are: 1) non-inferiority with the primary efficacy endpoint defined as recipient site wound closure at week 4 follow-up visit of the ReCell-treated area as compared to that of the STMSG-treated area, and 2)superiority in the healing of the ReCell donor site as compared to the STMSG donor site at week 1.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
The surgeon will be required to select two similar non-contiguous injury areas with both areas being at least 100cm2 and second degree depth/severity. One area will be treated using ReCell and the second using Split-thickness Skin Graft.