At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
A Prospective, Randomized, Open-label Multicenter Study Comparing the Pharmaceutical Economics and Effectiveness of Sevoflurane With Low Fresh Gas Flow Balanced Anesthesia, Propofol Target Controlled Infusion Anesthesia and Propofol Induction Sevoflurane Maintenance Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Surgeries in China
In Brief
A Phase 4 clinical trial evaluating Sevoflurane Inhalational Induction and Maintenance, Propofol Target Controlled Infusion for Induction and Maintenance, and 1 other intervention for Elective Laparoscopic Surgery. Completed, enrolled 336 participants across 4 sites.
Detailed Summary
This study is being performed to compare the cost of anesthetic techniques with sevoflurane (low fresh gas flow balanced anesthesia) versus propofol (target controlled infusion \[TCI\]) versus propofol induction and sevoflurane maintenance anesthesia in subjects undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery with predicted anesthesic use between 1 and 3 hour duration.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Sevoflurane was administered at a concentration of 8% via vital capacity induction and sevoflurane 0.8-1.5 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) with a rate of 1 L/min fresh gas flow for maintenance.
Propofol IV 4 ug/mL was administered with target controlled infusion (TCI) for induction and propofol 3 to 6 ug/mL was administered with TCI for maintenance.
Propofol was administered as a bolus IV dose of 1.5 mg/kg for induction at a rate of 40 mg/10 seconds. During maintenance, a sevoflurane concentration of 0.8-1.5 minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) was administered at a rate of 1 L/min fresh gas flow.