CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
Phase 2Completed· 100 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Insorb absorbable staples +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT01198691
NCT01198691Phase 2Completed

Closure of Pfannenstiel Skin Incisions After Cesarean Delivery: A Comparison of Metallic Staples Versus Absorbable Staples

TriHealth Inc.·interventional·Posted Sep 10, 2010·Updated Oct 9, 2018

In Brief

A Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating Insorb absorbable staples and Insorb for Cesarean Section. Completed, enrolled 100 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

The purpose of the study is to compare post operative pain, cost effectiveness, speed of closure and patient satisfaction of Pfannenstiel incisions closed with metallic staples versus absorbable staples (Insorb) after Cesarean Delivery.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--

Timeline

Phase 2CompletedFinished
2011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedSep 10, 2010
Enrollment StartJul 1, 2010
Primary CompletionMay 1, 2011
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 10 monthsPosted 15.8 years ago

Interventions

Insorb absorbable staplesdevice

Patients will be randomized to receive either the standard metallic staples or the Insorb absorbable staples

Insorbdevice

Patients will be randomized to receive either standard metallic staples or Insorb absorbable staples