CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 14 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Not specified
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT01204736
NCT01204736N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

A Comparison of Two Surgical Procedures That Restore Elbow Extension

VA Office of Research and Development·observational·Posted Sep 17, 2010·Updated Mar 8, 2016

In Brief

An observational study for Cervical Spinal Cord Injury. Completed, enrolled 14 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Active elbow extension has significant functional benefits for individuals with tetraplegia. The proposed work will provide information to assess how effectively people are using their elbow extension tendon transfers, and whether one surgery works more effectively than the other. This study will provide recommendations to clinicians about the possibility of improving function after surgery using rehab techniques.

Study Details

Study Typeobservational
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsCervical Spinal Cord Injury
CountriesUnited States
CollaboratorsShirley Ryan AbilityLab, Northwestern University, Case Western Reserve University, Loyola University, MetroHealth System, Ohio

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
2011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedSep 17, 2010
Enrollment StartAug 1, 2011
Primary CompletionDec 1, 2014
Study CompletionDec 1, 2015
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 3.3 yearsPosted 15.8 years ago