At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Blood Culture Contamination: A Cluster-randomized Cross-over Trial Evaluating the Comparative Effectiveness of Three Skin Antiseptic Interventions
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Iodine tincture, Chlorhexidine gluconate, and 1 other intervention for Bacteremia. Completed, enrolled 3,879 participants.
Detailed Summary
Background: Contaminated blood cultures result in unnecessary antibiotic use, increased length of stay, and additional laboratory tests, all of which increase healthcare costs. While the optimal skin antisepsis agent for reducing blood culture contamination is not known, the cost of various agents differs substantially. Objective: To determine the relative rates of blood culture contamination for 3 skin antisepsis interventions - 10% povidone iodine aqueous solution (PI), 2% iodine tincture (IT) and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol (CHG) - when used by dedicated phlebotomy teams to obtain peripheral blood cultures in adult non-ICU medical and surgical patients.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Iodine tincture (2% iodine and 2% sodium iodide diluted in 50% ethanol) packaged in a single 0.67 mL Sepp applicator (Enturia, Leewood KS)
2% chlorhexidine gluconate/70% isopropyl alcohol packaged in a single 1.5 ml Frepp applicators (Enturia, Leewood KS)
10% povidone iodine aqueous solution packaged in a single 0.67 Sepp applicator (Enturia, Leewood KS)