CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 623 enrolled
Drug / intervention
type of laryngoscopedevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT01235065
NCT01235065N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

GlideScope vs. Direct Laryngoscope for Emergency Intubation

University of Maryland, Baltimore·interventional·Posted Nov 5, 2010·Updated Jun 1, 2023

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating type of laryngoscope for Oral Intubation. Completed, enrolled 623 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess if the GlideScope video laryngoscope is superior to the Macintosh direct laryngoscope for definitive airway management in acutely-injured patients.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsOral Intubation
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202520262027
First PostedNov 5, 2010
Enrollment StartJul 1, 2008
Primary CompletionNov 16, 2016
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 8.4 yearsPosted 15.7 years ago

Interventions

type of laryngoscopedevice

Patients who require emergency rapid sequence intubation are randomized to intubation with either the direct laryngoscope or the video laryngoscope