CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
Phase 4Completed· 64 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Closure of vaginal cuffprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT01262573
NCT01262573Phase 4Completed

Barbed Suture vs Smooth Suture for Vaginal Cuff Closure, a Randomized Trial

Brigham and Women's Hospital·interventional·Posted Dec 17, 2010·Updated Jan 16, 2017

In Brief

A Phase 4 clinical trial evaluating Closure of vaginal cuff for Closure of Vaginal Cuff at Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. Completed, enrolled 64 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

This study compares outcomes among patients having a total laparoscopic hysterectomy. This involves removing the uterus and cervix using a laparoscopic or keyhole technique. The top of the vagina is routinely sutured closed after this procedure and this study is comparing two different suture materials for this purpose. One suture material is a barbed suture that has the advantage of maintaining good tension and closure on the wound. The other is a standard smooth suture that is commonly used for this procedure. The investigators are comparing the time it takes to close the vaginal cuff, as well as bleeding after surgery and the healing of the top of the vagina.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--

Timeline

Phase 4CompletedFinished
2011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedDec 17, 2010
Enrollment StartDec 1, 2010
Primary CompletionJun 1, 2012
Study CompletionNov 1, 2012
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.5 yearsPosted 15.5 years ago

Interventions

Closure of vaginal cuffprocedure

Closure of the vaginal cuff