At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Examining the Ease of Intubation Using the Parker Flex-Tip® or a Standard Mallinckrodt® Endotracheal When Using the Glidescope®
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Mallinckrodt (ETT) and Parker Flex-Tip (ETT) for Larynx. Completed, enrolled 60 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The purpose of the study is to determine if there are differences related to ease of intubation reported by clinicians who use the Parker Flex-Tip® endotracheal tubes(ETT)compared to the standard Mallinckrodt® (ETT). The problem is two (ETTs), the Parker Flex-Tip® and the Mallinckrodt®, are currently available for use in operative suites for intubation, but few studies have compared these devices with each other. Two research questions to be answered in the study are 1. Is there a difference in the ease of intubation when the Parker Flex-Tip® (ETT) is used when compared to the standard Mallinckrodt® (ETT)? and 2. Are there differences in the number of successful intubations when comparing the Parker Flex-Tip® (ETT) and the standard Mallinckrodt® (ETT)? The hypotheses are the use of the Parker Flex-Tip® (ETT) will demonstrate: 1. Fewer seconds to intubate the trachea. 2. Higher self-reported ease of placement scores and 3. Fewer redirections to intubate the trachea. The number of successful intubations is expected to be the same in both arms of the study.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
7.0 millimeter internal diameter for female 8.0 millimeter internal diameter for male
7.0 millimeter internal diameter for female 8.0 millimeter internal diameter for male