CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 123 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Foley bulbdevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT01279343
NCT01279343N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

Cervical Foley Plus Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction: A Randomized Trial

Washington University School of Medicine·interventional·Posted Jan 19, 2011·Updated May 3, 2019

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Foley bulb for Induction of Labor. Completed, enrolled 123 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of the combination of the supracervical foley bulb and vaginal misoprostol to vaginal misoprostol alone for labor induction. We hypothesize that use of the foley bulb plus vaginal misoprostol will result in shorter induction to delivery time.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsInduction of Labor
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
2011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedJan 19, 2011
Enrollment StartJan 1, 2011
Primary CompletionMar 1, 2014
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 3.2 yearsPosted 15.5 years ago

Interventions

Foley bulbdevice

This is a randomized trial comparing foley bulb with the use of misoprostol versus use of misoprostol alone for cervical ripening and labor induction.