At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 30 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Route of feeding (nasogastric vs. nasojejunal)other
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
The Efficacy and Safety of Gastric Feeding in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients Receiving Non-invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation: A Pilot Study
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre·interventional·Posted Feb 23, 2011·Updated Jul 16, 2014
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Route of feeding (nasogastric vs. nasojejunal) for Respiratory Insufficiency and 2 related conditions. Completed, enrolled 30 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The investigators are studying whether it is safe and effective to provide enteral nutrition to critically ill children via the nasogastric route, as opposed to the nasojejunal route, while they are receiving noninvasive positive pressure ventilation.
Study Details
Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesCanada
Collaborators--
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
2011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Enrollment StartFeb 2011
First PostedFeb 2011
Primary CompletionJun 2014
TodayJul 2026
First PostedFeb 23, 2011
Enrollment StartFeb 1, 2011
Primary CompletionJun 1, 2014
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 3.3 yearsPosted 15.4 years ago
Interventions
Route of feeding (nasogastric vs. nasojejunal)other
Safety and efficacy of feeding nasogastrically vs. nasojejunally while receiving noninvasive positive pressure ventilation