CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 168 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Cancer risk communication skills trainingother
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT01361035
NCT01361035N/ACompleted

Using Effective Provider-Patient Communication to Improve Cancer Screening Among Low Literacy Patients

Tulane University School of Medicine·interventional·Posted May 26, 2011·Updated Mar 10, 2017

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Cancer risk communication skills training for Cervical Cancer and 2 related conditions. Completed, enrolled 168 participants across 5 sites.

Detailed Summary

What's the purpose of this study? This 4-year study is designed: (1) to teach primary care physicians how to recognize low health literacy patients and effectively counsel them on cancer screening using risk communication and shared decision making and (2) to assess the impact of training on changes in physician communication behavior and changes in low health literacy patients' cancer screening behaviors. This study proposal is based on the hypothesis that physician training in cancer screening guidelines, health literacy, and communication skills will improve provider-patient interactions during encounters dealing with preventive health maintenance especially cancer screening. How will the proposed study be implemented? Thirty-two physicians in the New Orleans metropolitan area will be recruited and randomly assigned to one of two groups. The unit of randomization will be the health care organization or clinic. The intervention group will receive training in health literacy, cancer screening, risk communication and shared decision-making. The control group will not receive communication training until the end of the study. Physicians in both groups will undergo three clinic visits with standardized patients (actors trained to portray real patients; mystery shoppers) but they will not be aware that they are conducting visits with actors. The visits will occur at study enrollment and at 6 and 12 months. At the end of each clinic visit, the standardized patients will rate the physicians' communication skills. Each physician assigned to the intervention group will receive verbal feedback on communication skills from the standardized patients and complete a web-based tutorial. Physicians in the control group will not have access to the web-based tutorial until the end of the study. For each physician, 10-15 patients with limited health literacy will be recruited to the study. Each patient will rate his/her perceived involvement with care and global satisfaction with care at study enrollment and annually for three years. Age and gender-appropriate referral rates for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening and patients' receipt of such screening will be assessed annually for three years. All study physicians, regardless of group assignment, will receive performance feedback (report cards) on their cancer screening rates among low health literacy patients in their clinic.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesUnited States

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202520262027
First PostedMay 26, 2011
Enrollment StartJun 1, 2008
Primary CompletionJun 1, 2012
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 4 yearsPosted 15.1 years ago

Interventions

Cancer risk communication skills trainingother

Intervention physicians receive training in cancer risk communication and shared decision making (SDM). At the end of each visit with intervention physicians, standardized patients (SPs) reveal themselves as actors and give structured verbal feedback. After baseline SP visits, each intervention physician undergoes academic detailing with a communication expert. Intervention physicians are directed to a web-based communication skills tutorial where SP ratings are hyperlinked to key references for supplemental reading. Both study groups will receive annual reports detailing their patients' cancer screening status and aggregate ratings of their communication style.