At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
ABSORB II RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL A Clinical Evaluation to Compare the Safety, Efficacy and Performance of ABSORB Everolimus Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold System Against XIENCE Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Subjects With Ischemic Heart Disease Caused by de Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Abbott Vascular XIENCE Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System and Abbott Vascular ABSORB Everolimus Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold System for Coronary Artery Disease. Completed, enrolled 501 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
Prospective, randomized (2:1), active control, single blinded, parallel two-arm, multi-center clinical investigation using Abbott Vascular ABSORB Everolimus Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold System (ABSORB BVS); compared to Abbott Vascular XIENCE Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (XIENCE)
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
XIENCE implantation in the treatment of coronary artery disease.
ABSORB BVS implantation in the treatment of coronary artery disease.