At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Utility of Intravenous Lacosamide Compared With Fosphenytoin in the Treatment of Patients With Frequent Nonconvulsive Seizures
In Brief
A Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating fPHT and LCM for Nonconvulsive Seizures. Completed, enrolled 74 participants across 11 sites.
Detailed Summary
This a phase 2 study comparing the efficacy of intravenous (IV) lacosamide (LCM) with IV fosphenytoin (fPHT) in controlling frequent nonconvulsive seizures (NCSs), the Adverse Events profile of LCM compared with fPHT when used to treat frequent NCSs, and length of stay in an intensive care unit for subjects treated with LCM versus subjects treated with fPHT. The trial will include a preacute-treatment period, an acute-treatment period, a postacute-treatment period, and a long-term follow-up period.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
If after initial treatment with fPHT any of the following occurs, the subject will have reached the end of the first treatment arm and will "cross over" and begin receiving the other drug, ie, the one not originally administered: the subject subsequently has another seizure within 24 hours following the 2-hour post-rebolus observation-only period; the subject does not receive a rebolus but has a seizure within 24 hours following the 2 hour post-bolus observation-only period; the subject experiences an AE that precludes further use of the first study drug. If crossover occurs, the subject will "start over" with the second drug, going through the same observation-only period, rebolusing (if necessary), and study assessments with the second drug, beginning with the Baseline assessments.
If after initial treatment with LCM any of the following occurs, the subject will have reached the end of the first treatment arm and will "cross over" and begin receiving the other drug, ie, the one not originally administered: the subject subsequently has another seizure within 24 hours following the 2-hour post-rebolus observation-only period; the subject does not receive a rebolus but has a seizure within 24 hours following the 2 hour post-bolus observation-only period; the subject experiences an AE that precludes further use of the first study drug. If crossover occurs, the subject will "start over" with the second drug, going through the same observation-only period, rebolusing (if necessary), and study assessments with the second drug, beginning with the Baseline assessments.