CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 1,147 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Iodine-alcohol +1 moredrug
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT01472549
NCT01472549N/ACompleted

Antiseptic Skin Preparation for Preventing Surgical Site Infection at Cesarean Delivery: a Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial

Washington University School of Medicine·interventional·Posted Nov 16, 2011·Updated Aug 8, 2018

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Iodine-alcohol and Chlorhexidine-alcohol for Surgical Site Infections. Completed, enrolled 1,147 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

The investigators propose a randomized controlled clinical trial to determine the comparative effectiveness of chlorhexidine-alcohol and iodine-alcohol preoperative skin preparation for preventing surgical site infections at cesarean section. While estimates vary, surgical site infections complicate up to 5 - 10% of all cesarean sections and result in significant human suffering and excess health care costs. Interventions such as preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis reduce surgical site infections by 60%, but the rate of infection remains high. There is therefore a great need to identify and test other potential interventions to further reduce these infections. The skin is a major source of pathogens that cause surgical site infection. Therefore, optimizing preoperative skin antisepsis has the potential to decrease postoperative surgical site infections. There is paucity of evidence to guide the choice of antiseptic for skin preparation at cesarean section. To date, only two underpowered trials have been published comparing two methods of preoperative skin preparation at cesarean section. A recent randomized trial in adults undergoing clean-contaminated mostly general surgical procedures demonstrated a 41% reduction in surgical site infection with the use of chlorhexidine-alcohol when compared to the more commonly used povidone-iodine. While it is plausible that findings from trials in other clean-contaminated surgical procedures may apply to cesarean sections, physiological changes in pregnancy, the peculiar dual microbial source for cesarean-related infections and the hormone-mediated immune-modulation in pregnancy make the validity of such extrapolation uncertain. The study has the following specific aims: Primary Aim: To test the hypothesis that preoperative chlorhexidine-alcohol skin preparation at cesarean section significantly reduces surgical site infections compared to iodine-alcohol. Secondary Aim 1: To test the hypothesis that preoperative chlorhexidine-alcohol skin preparation at cesarean section significantly reduces bacterial contamination at the surgical site compared to iodine-alcohol. Secondary Aim 2: To determine clinical outcomes and medical costs associated with cesarean-related infections and quantify potential cost savings attributable to use of chlorhexidine-alcohol for preoperative skin preparation at cesarean section.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedNov 16, 2011
Enrollment StartSep 1, 2011
Primary CompletionJun 1, 2015
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 3.8 yearsPosted 14.6 years ago

Interventions

Iodine-alcoholdrug

Skin preparation with 8.3% povidone-iodine with 72.5% alcohol (Prevail-FX, Cardinal Health) preoperative skin preparation.

Chlorhexidine-alcoholdrug

Skin preparation with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate with 70% alcohol (ChloraPrep, Cardinal Health) preoperative skin preparation