CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 65 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Endotracheal intubationdevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT01488370
NCT01488370N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

A Comparison of the Glidescope® Video Laryngoscope and the Storz DCI® Video Laryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation in Children Younger Than Two Years of Age

Loma Linda University·interventional·Posted Dec 8, 2011·Updated Mar 26, 2019

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Endotracheal intubation for Endotracheal Intubation. Completed, enrolled 65 participants across 2 sites.

Detailed Summary

This is a prospective randomized clinical study to be performed in pediatric patients under the age of 2 years who are undergoing surgical procedures requiring endotracheal intubation. Time to endotracheal intubation will be compared between patients intubated using a GlideScope® video laryngoscope, those intubated with a Storz DCI® video laryngoscope, and those intubated by standard direct laryngoscopy. The study hypothesis is that the time to endotracheal intubation will be decreased in the Storz DCI® video laryngoscope group when compared to the GlideScope® video laryngoscope group and standard laryngoscopy.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsEndotracheal Intubation
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedDec 8, 2011
Enrollment StartNov 1, 2011
Primary CompletionJul 1, 2015
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 3.7 yearsPosted 14.6 years ago

Interventions

Endotracheal intubationdevice

Endotracheal intubation