At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
A Controlled, Prospective, Non-Inferiority, Parallel-Group, Randomised, Interventional, Open, Blinded Outcome Assessment (PROBE-Design), Multi-centre Trial, Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Isolation of the PVs With a Cryoballoon Catheter vs a Radiofrequency Ablation With a ThermoCool Catheter in Patients With PAF
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins and Electrical isolation of pulmonary veins for Symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (PAF). Completed, enrolled 769 participants across 19 sites in 8 countries.
Detailed Summary
Comparing efficacy and safety of isolation of the pulmonary veins (PV) using a Cryoballoon catheter versus a radiofrequency ablation with a ThermoCool catheter in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Device: ArcticFront® Cardiac CryoAblation Catheter System with the FlexCath Steerable Sheath or ArcticFront® Advance Cardiac CryoAblation Catheter System with the FlexCath Steerable Sheath or any future development generations of this product line, provided they are CE marked and the centre has the experience of at least 10 procedures before including a patient into the study.
Device:NaviStar® ThermoCool® Irrigated Tip Ablation Catheter in combination with 3D mapping system CARTO or any future development generations of this product line, provided they are CE marked and the centre has the experience of at least 10 procedures before including a patient into the study.