CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
Phase 4Completed· 52 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Patient controlled epidural analgesia +1 moreprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT01560429
NCT01560429Phase 4Completed

Efficacy of Patient Controlled Epidural Anesthesia (PCEA) Versus Continuous Epidural Analgesia (CEA) for Post-thoracotomy Pain.

Queen's University·interventional·Posted Mar 22, 2012·Updated Jul 21, 2016

In Brief

A Phase 4 clinical trial evaluating Patient controlled epidural analgesia and Continuous epidural analgesia for Acute Post-thoracotomy Pain. Completed, enrolled 52 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Postoperative thoracotomy pain is normally managed with an epidural catheter and continuous epidural analgesia (CEA). However, for some surgical procedures, patient controlled epidural anesthesia (PCEA) is more effective but little research has compared the two methods following thoracotomy. The current randomized, prospective clinical investigation did just this. Following institutional ethics approval 52 patients scheduled for thoracotomy were recruited for this prospective, randomized, unblinded study. A thoracic epidural catheter was sited preoperatively. Postoperatively all patients were titrated on continuous epidural infusions (hydromorphone 10 mcg/mL + bupivacaine 1 mg/mL) until pain scores were stable at ≤3 on a numeric rating scale (NRS). Then they were allocated to their preoperatively determined randomization (either remained on continuous epidural infusion or they were switched to receive 2/3 of the stabilized background dose via continuous epidural infusion with the option to self-administer the remaining 1/3rd of the dose via PCEA. Participants remained on their allocated analgesic regimens for 48 hours postoperatively. The primary outcome was consumption of local anaesthetics/opioids. The secondary outcomes were worst pain and pain while coughing (0-10 NRS).

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesCanada
Collaborators--

Timeline

Phase 4CompletedFinished
200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedMar 22, 2012
Enrollment StartJun 1, 2009
Primary CompletionJul 1, 2010
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.1 yearsPosted 14.3 years ago

Interventions

Patient controlled epidural analgesiaprocedure

Continuous epidural infusion rates were set to maintain pain scores of ≤ 3 on a numeric rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10 while in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) following thoracotomy. Once stabilized patients were switched to Patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) which meant they continued to receive 2/3rds of the dose as continuous background epidural infusions but they had the option to receive the remaining 1/3rd dosage via PCEA.

Continuous epidural analgesiaprocedure

The continuous epidural analgesia (CEA) infusion rates were titrated to achieve pain scores of ≤ 3 on a numeric rating scale (NRS) of 0 to 10 while in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (as described for the PCEA group above). Those allocated to the CEA group remained on the same continuous epidural analgesia infusion which maintained the pain scores at ≤ 3.