At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 40 enrolled
Drug / intervention
cortical FDBA +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Histological Comparison of Healing Following Tooth Extraction With Ridge Preservation Using Cortical Versus Cancellous Freeze Dried Bone Allograft
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio·interventional·Posted May 1, 2012·Updated Oct 22, 2015
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating cortical FDBA and Cancellous FDBA for Tooth Extraction. Completed, enrolled 40 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare cortical and cancellous freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) materials in the preservation of alveolar bone following extraction of non-molar teeth. The primary objective is to histologically evaluate and compare the healing of extraction sockets of non-molar teeth grafted with cortical FDBA versus cancellous FDBA for ridge preservation.
Study Details
Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsTooth Extraction
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
2011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Enrollment StartOct 2010
First PostedMay 2012
Primary CompletionJul 2012
TodayJul 2026
First PostedMay 1, 2012
Enrollment StartOct 1, 2010
Primary CompletionJul 1, 2012
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.8 yearsPosted 14.2 years ago
Interventions
cortical FDBAdevice
cortical mineralized freeze-dried bone allograft
Cancellous FDBAdevice
CANCELLOUS FREEZE-DRIED BONE ALLOGRAFT (from LifeNet Health)