CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 352 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Risk Assessmentbehavioral
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT01596582
NCT01596582N/ACompleted

Impact of Risk Stratification on Shared Decision-Making for Colorectal Cancer Screening

Boston Medical Center·interventional·Posted May 11, 2012·Updated Mar 21, 2017

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Risk Assessment for Colorectal Cancer. Completed, enrolled 352 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Shared decision-making (SDM) has been advocated as a strategy for increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates. Our studies to date suggest that while the use of a novel computer-based decision aid facilitates several components of SDM from both the patient and provider perspective, there is a reluctance among providers to acquiesce to patient preferences for a particular screening strategy when its differs from their own. The overall objective of this study is to assess whether risk stratification for advanced colorectal neoplasia influences clinical decision-making related to screening test selection and adherence within a SDM framework. Eligible subjects will be randomized to either an experimental arm, in which they will be asked to complete a 6-item risk assessment questionnaire known as the "Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia Index \[ACNI\]" after reviewing a web-based decision aid, or a control arm, in which they will only review the decision aid. Both interventions will take place just before a prearranged office visit with their provider. The primary outcome will be screening test ordered; secondary outcomes will include test completion rates, concordance between test preference and test ordered,, patient satisfaction with decision-making process, screening intentions, 6-month test completion rates and provider satisfaction. Outcomes will be evaluated using computerized tracking systems or validated instruments.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedMay 11, 2012
Enrollment StartApr 1, 2012
Primary CompletionFeb 1, 2016
Study CompletionJun 1, 2016
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 3.8 yearsPosted 14.1 years ago

Interventions

Risk Assessmentbehavioral

Patients randomized to the experimental arm will be asked a complete the ACNI risk assessment tool after reviewing a web-based colorectal cancer decision aid. The ACNI uses a point based system to stratify patients into low (mean rate of ACN \~3%) versus intermediate/high (\~ 8%) risk groups based on responses to 6 items: age (50-59, 60-69, 70+), sex (male/female), race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic black, other), smoking history (never, \<20 years, 20+ years), daily alcohol intake (\< 2 vs. \>/=2 drinks) and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (ever, never). The index represents a prototype version of the Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia Index (Am J Gastroenterol 2015;110:1062-71).